These functions were deprecated in purrr 1.0.0 and are now defunct because
they are slow and buggy, and we no longer think they are the right
approach to solving this problem. Please use tidyr::expand_grid()
instead.
Here is an example of equivalent usages for cross() and
expand_grid():
Usage
cross(.l, .filter = NULL)
cross2(.x, .y, .filter = NULL)
cross3(.x, .y, .z, .filter = NULL)
cross_df(.l, .filter = NULL)Value
cross2(), cross3() and cross()
always return a list. cross_df() always returns a data
frame. cross() returns a list where each element is one
combination so that the list can be directly mapped
over. cross_df() returns a data frame where each row is one
combination.
Details
cross2() returns the product set of the elements of
.x and .y. cross3() takes an additional
.z argument. cross() takes a list .l and
returns the cartesian product of all its elements in a list, with
one combination by element. cross_df() is like
cross() but returns a data frame, with one combination by
row.
cross(), cross2() and cross3() return the
cartesian product is returned in wide format. This makes it more
amenable to mapping operations. cross_df() returns the output
in long format just as expand.grid() does. This is adapted
to rowwise operations.
When the number of combinations is large and the individual
elements are heavy memory-wise, it is often useful to filter
unwanted combinations on the fly with .filter. It must be
a predicate function that takes the same number of arguments as the
number of crossed objects (2 for cross2(), 3 for
cross3(), length(.l) for cross()) and
returns TRUE or FALSE. The combinations where the
predicate function returns TRUE will be removed from the
result.
